This book, you see, is a few generations old. This is the kind of information your moms and grandparents got. This is the scariest bloody thing I have read all year.
Behind this cut are several scans. They mention sex, though not in any positive way. You have been warned.
First of all I have to mention that I have no idea from what time period this book comes. There's no date in the book itself, but from the inside cover picture...

...I'm guessing around the fifties. ETA: 1951! Hooray for the internet! That's about 50 years ago. Remember this, as you read the tome of information known only as:

Written by Harold Shryock, M.A, M.D. And you know, I'm not certain, but I'm pretty sure he's not a chick.
So, it starts off mildly enough, with an introduction. We look to the future, and the joys of backbreaking labour that await you as a homemaker.

And here we have the book's rationale. I actually did wonder about the level of detail the author was willing to go into, but here we see the idea behind it all. It's for wholesomeness! Whew!

So, we have a little bit about the importance of decision making before you are pressed into your god-given role.

Then we get to the good bits!

Well, so you'd think. In actual fact the whole thing is written in much the same way as a medical textbook. There are all the proper parts and their functions in intricate detail, and it's all kind of simultaneously enlightening and baffling.
Until we reach the end of the chapter, in which we learn that teenage boys are slaves to their penises and can only be saved by the calm, rational teenage girls. Well, thank goodness for that.


So the next chapter, personal problems. It's starts off innocently enough, with more musing on the wonderfulness of serving men:

It came as rather a surprise to me then, to learn the actual theme of the chapter.
Masturbation.
Or, more specifically, how masturbation is so evil, it sucks away your life force and makes you become stupid! OhmygodARRRgh!!

You think that's bad? This is plain disgusting:

Yes, that's right. Female circumcision is not at all hazardous. Jesus.
Now that masturbation's out of the way, we have actual sex. Of course it's evil, but it shouldn't be a problem to stop it, because woman only enjoy it because they're giving a man pleasure. Of course.

So, apparently sex is out, masturbation is out, dreaming of a future as anything other than a housewife is out. Can we have any fun at all, you ask?
And the answer is:

Nope.
But wait, what's this?

We can toast marshmallows next to a wholesome fire! Yay!
And that's becoming a woman, in a nutshell. Are you as depressed as I am? No wait, I'm moreso, having read the chapters on homosexuality.
Just remember:

We've come a long way, baby.
ETA: Okay, okay :-). Here's a chapter on homosexuality. It's appalling. Don't say I didn't warn you!
ETA (again): People have asked lots of questions. I therefore proudly present the FAQ. Read and be enlightened.
← Ctrl← Alt
Ctrl →Alt →
April 28 2005, 06:46:12 UTC 7 years ago
Anonymous
May 17 2005, 00:57:39 UTC 7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
5 years ago
Anonymous
5 years ago
5 years ago
3 years ago
Anonymous
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
Anonymous
7 years ago
7 years ago
Anonymous
7 years ago
6 years ago
April 28 2005, 07:53:49 UTC 7 years ago
hi, was directed here by
April 28 2005, 08:24:02 UTC 7 years ago
April 28 2005, 10:36:38 UTC 7 years ago
May 18 2005, 17:35:34 UTC 7 years ago
April 28 2005, 11:45:00 UTC 7 years ago
April 28 2005, 17:02:09 UTC 7 years ago
3 years ago
April 28 2005, 13:52:24 UTC 7 years ago
I've been reading cases on sexual harassment/discrimination, and struggling to understand certain of the implications that the (predominantly male) judges are making, but I think it makes more sense now. Jesus.
April 28 2005, 17:37:15 UTC 7 years ago
April 28 2005, 17:26:24 UTC 7 years ago
April 28 2005, 17:36:02 UTC 7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
April 28 2005, 18:51:04 UTC 7 years ago
May 16 2005, 18:23:15 UTC 7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
Anonymous
4 years ago
April 28 2005, 19:46:29 UTC 7 years ago
Um...I...am...completely...speehless!
I hope you don't mind if I like this to my memories.
Um...I am going to find myself a good woman, now, who has read this book and we are going to live the life of Ozzy and Harriet and have two strapping
drug addictssons.Is it any wonder that 50s housewives were addicted to Valium and drank like fish?
April 28 2005, 19:49:11 UTC 7 years ago
May 20 2005, 00:12:56 UTC 7 years ago
3 years ago
April 28 2005, 19:49:56 UTC 7 years ago
May 18 2005, 12:58:04 UTC 7 years ago
Anonymous
5 years ago
3 years ago
April 28 2005, 20:22:29 UTC 7 years ago
That's just...
I...
uh...
Jesus.
Deleted comment
June 13 2005, 18:28:10 UTC 6 years ago
If you wanted to go with Sekhmet I could teach you how ;D
April 28 2005, 22:59:52 UTC 7 years ago
...and then I looked up the guy on Worldcat (newfirstsearch.oclc.org, which it looks like your library needs to have a membership to view), and my goodness, he's written others!
Happiness for husbands and wives (1949)
On becoming a man: a book for teenage boys (companion volume! also 1951)
You and your health (1970, with Hubert Oscar Swartout; 1978, solo; 1985, with Mervyn G. Hardinge)
Modern medical guide (1979)
Mind if I smoke? (1959; 1963; 1965; 1970)
Your medical guide (1983)
Family medical guide to health & fitness (1991, with Mervyn G. Hardinge and "28 leading medical specialists")
Also, as far as I can tell from the listings, both On becoming a man and On becoming a woman were translated into Vietnamese (!) as Tuoi cài trâm: sách giáo duc thieu nu’ trong tuoi day thì (1990) and Tru’o’c tuoi thành nhân (ngu’o’i con trai) (1983) respectively.
...and this isn't all of it.
April 29 2005, 00:16:58 UTC 7 years ago
I have Our Home, published in 1899, written almost reasonably by Charles E. Sargent, M.A. Here's a fabulous quote from the chapter "Education of Our Girls":
We hope the world has heard the last of that sickly sentiment concerning "woman's sphere," "the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world," etc. If that hand were permitted to take hold of the world a little more directly, it would not at all interfere with its ability to rock the cradle...We would see the little sister and brother hand in hand enter the primary school...[through University graduating exercises...]
Then there is "Heart Throbs, The Best of DC Romance Comics," which darling
I would gladly buy this book from you, blinky, to add to my collection. Will you sell?
You've made me a happy girl today. ♥ ♥ ♥
May 5 2005, 09:30:13 UTC 7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
April 29 2005, 00:34:40 UTC 7 years ago
April 29 2005, 06:02:03 UTC 7 years ago
Jesus tapdancing Christ...
I am disgusted that this was considered fit to print in any decade after the Middle Ages.What's even more despicable is that this is just *one* example of the sort of bullshit that 'sixties and 'seventies feminists had to fight against, and the battle is still a long way from over.
Gender stereotypes for either sex are offensive and irrelevant, bud sadly there are still plenty of conservative morons out there who believe this crap and think they're doing their children a favour by passing it on to them. Ye gods...
And if it's not desirable to live in a world of make believe by reading and creating fiction, what the gobsmacking f**k else am I supposed to do to be happy?
(Yes I know I'm a bloke, but the question applies to everyone who enjoys reading and writing, regardless of what they keep stashed away in their pants.)
W
April 29 2005, 06:19:06 UTC 7 years ago
Re: Jesus tapdancing Christ...
Toasting marshmallows, obviously!! Silly boy :-).7 years ago
Anonymous
7 years ago
4 years ago
April 29 2005, 07:37:07 UTC 7 years ago
April 29 2005, 20:46:13 UTC 7 years ago
April 29 2005, 23:15:00 UTC 7 years ago
Strangely enough, I'm reading some "household" books and treatises on womanhood from the nineteenth century that were more progressive than this book.
But what I really wanted to say was -- all the Elizabeth Taylor clones in that first picture are scary. *g*
May 18 2005, 01:16:06 UTC 7 years ago
That dress reminded me INSTANTLY of the original "Father of the Bride" movie, wherein L.T. played The Bride.
I'm pretty sure her dress had a longer train, though.
7 years ago
April 30 2005, 03:59:18 UTC 7 years ago
April 30 2005, 13:37:28 UTC 7 years ago
About the post - I think I need to kill someone. Right now.
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
April 30 2005, 21:20:59 UTC 7 years ago
May 16 2005, 00:56:49 UTC 7 years ago
May 4 2005, 08:03:05 UTC 7 years ago
*insert sarcasm* Such a keen book. Everyone should have one.
May 4 2005, 14:57:48 UTC 7 years ago
I think there are a lot of people there who would get a kick out of them.
May 5 2005, 09:25:30 UTC 7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
May 6 2005, 19:36:10 UTC 7 years ago
But yeah, I had to add this to my memories - classic stuff!
Female circumcision?! WHHYY?! That's TOO horrible!! It's dangeous and horrible, and plus - if I ever lost my bean I'd weep. I love my bean.
I've heard of FC as FGM (female genital mutilation) and it's standard practise in some under-developed and highly religious countries in Africa and similar places. I watched a doc on it and it can cause all sorts of problems - some girls actually died from the infections that ensued. And this twat is saying it's a healthy, risk-free procedure?! ARGH!
But all-in-all, very entertaining! Thank you so much for scanning in all those pages! (I arrived here via Narissah ^_^)
May 18 2005, 16:07:47 UTC 7 years ago
Or he could mean the whole thing.
Either way he's a bastard for even suggesting it.
7 years ago
7 years ago
Anonymous
7 years ago
← Ctrl← Alt
Ctrl →Alt →